jurisdiction: one overview

One that the most basic questions the is even if it is a provided court has actually jurisdiction come preside end a given case. A jurisdictional question might be damaged down into three components:

whether over there is personal jurisdiction . This is further damaged down right into 3 categories (See Pennoyer v. Neff for additional information): whether over there is jurisdiction come render the particular judgment sought.

You are watching: Which best defines the term jurisdiction?

The term jurisdiction deserve to be finest understood by being compared to "power." any type of court possesses jurisdiction over matters just to the extent granted to it by the Constitution, and/or regulation of the sovereignty on instead of of which it attributes (ex: a state court in Mississippi may need statutory permission by the Mississippi legislature come hear certain types of cases). The concern of even if it is a given court has actually the strength to determine a jurisdictional question is chin a jurisdictional question. Together a legal concern is referred to as "jurisdiction to determine jurisdiction."

Subject matter jurisdiction is the court"s authority to decision the problem in dispute such as a contract issue, or a civil civil liberties issue. State courts have general jurisdiction, definition that they deserve to hear any controversy except those banned by state (some states, for example, refuse subject matter jurisdiction for a case that does no involve state citizens and also did no take location in the state) and also those allocated to federal courts that exclusive jurisdiction such together bankruptcy worries (see 28 U.S.C. § 1334). Commonwealth courts have restricted jurisdiction in the they deserve to only hear instances that fall both within the scope defined by the structure in article III section 2 and also Congressional statutes (See 28 U.S.C. §1251, §1253, §1331, §1332).

Territorial jurisdiction is the court"s strength to bind the next to the action. This identify the limit of federal and also state court power. State court ar jurisdiction is determined by the Due process Clause the the Constitution"s Fourteenth Amendment and also the federal court territorial jurisdiction is figured out by the Due process Clause of the Constitution"s fifth Amendment. (For more, view World-Wide Volkswagen v. Woodson; view also International shoes v. Washington).

Other develops of jurisdiction incorporate appellate jurisdiction (the power of one court to exactly the errors that another, reduced court), concurrent jurisdiction (the id that 2 courts could share the power to hear situations of the same type, developing in the exact same place), and diversity jurisdiction (the strength of federal courts to hear instances in i m sorry the parties space from various states). An instance showing the interplay of diversity jurisdiction v subject-matter jurisdiction is Grupo Dataflux v. Atlas worldwide Group, L. P. (02-1689), 541 U.S.

See more: Natal I Hope You Find Someone More Toxic, I Hope You Find Somebody More Toxic Archives

567 (2004). 

Parties will often sue a defendant that is a residents of a various state. For a state court come hear this case, that court will typically need to satisfy the constitution due process requirement because that territorial jurisdiction (see above) and the state statutory requirement, i m sorry is commonly known as a state"s long-arm statute.